Kitchener-Waterloo Criminal Defence Lawyers

Home › Criminal Defence › Kitchener-Waterloo Criminal Defence Lawyers

Waterloo Region has one criminal courthouse. It stands at 85 Frederick Street in Kitchener, the Ministry of the Attorney General calls it the Waterloo Region Courthouse, and it takes criminal charges from Kitchener, Waterloo and Cambridge alike. Most of what goes badly wrong in a Waterloo Region criminal case goes wrong early and quietly: the wrong address, a missed fingerprinting window, a bail condition nobody read twice. This page is built around those failure points rather than around us. And since it matters to you, the second thing you should know is that our offices are in Toronto, Thornhill, North York and Oakville. None of them is in the Region.

By Fadi Matthew Kazandji, Founding Partner, Kazandji Law. Updated September 2026.

The risk of the wrong building: 85 Frederick Street, 77 Queen Street North, and only one of them is a criminal court

Waterloo Region has two buildings that local people call the courthouse. Only one of them hears criminal charges.

The criminal building is the Waterloo Region Courthouse at 85 Frederick Street, Kitchener N2H 0A7. The Ontario Court of Justice lists it as the Kitchener Courthouse. The Ministry of the Attorney General lists it as the Waterloo Region Courthouse. One seven storey building, two official names, and that is the first of many small confusions this page exists to clear up. The Superior Court of Justice sits in the same building. Its criminal scheduling office handles trials, judicial pre-trials, bail hearings and bail reviews, ninety day detention reviews, criminal applications and motions, and assignment and trial scheduling court, through Kitchener.Superior.Court@ontario.ca or 519-741-3200 extension 3240.

The other building is 77 Queen Street North. That is where the Region of Waterloo administers Provincial Offences Act matters: Highway Traffic Act charges, municipal by-law offences, the sort of thing that arrives as a ticket rather than as a release document. The Region publishes counter hours of 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday to Friday. Where a Summons to Defendant requires a mandatory appearance, that appearance is heard in Courtroom 101, in person or by Zoom. Nothing under the Criminal Code is heard at 77 Queen Street North.

People get this wrong in both directions. Someone with a speeding ticket arrives at 85 Frederick Street and cannot find their name on any list. Someone with an assault charge arrives at 77 Queen Street North and is sent across the downtown with minutes to spare. The second mistake is the expensive one, because a criminal matter called in your absence can produce a bench warrant, and a bench warrant turns an ordinary file into a bail problem.

Building	What it is	What is heard there	Who runs it
85 Frederick Street, Kitchener N2H 0A7	Waterloo Region Courthouse, also listed as the Kitchener Courthouse	Criminal and criminal youth matters in the Ontario Court of Justice, and Superior Court of Justice criminal matters, for Kitchener, Waterloo and Cambridge	Province of Ontario
77 Queen Street North, Kitchener	Provincial Offences court office	Provincial Offences Act charges, Highway Traffic Act matters and municipal by-law offences. No Criminal Code charge	Region of Waterloo

The Region publishes its own parking guidance for 77 Queen Street North: a small lot beside the building, the Kitchener Public Library underground parking next door, and an above ground lot on the far side of the library. Useful if that is genuinely your building. Irrelevant if it is not. If your paperwork names an address, that address is the answer, and if it names none, telephone the courthouse before the date rather than on the morning of it. Our broader criminal defence practice covers the charge types heard at 85 Frederick Street.

The risk of assuming Waterloo has its own criminal court

It does not. Not a small one, not a satellite one, not a part time one. Criminal charges laid in the City of Waterloo are answered at 85 Frederick Street in Kitchener, and so are charges laid in Cambridge and in the surrounding townships.

This is worth stating carefully, because a search for a Waterloo criminal lawyer returns pages that quietly suggest otherwise. Three independent official sources say the same thing.

• The Ministry of the Attorney General maintains an index of provincial court locations across Ontario. Exactly one entry in that index falls inside Waterloo Region, and it is 85 Frederick Street in Kitchener. There is no Waterloo entry and no Cambridge entry.
• The Ontario Court of Justice publishes a Kitchener location page. It publishes no Waterloo location page at all.
• Infrastructure Ontario, the Crown agency that delivered the building, states that the Waterloo Region Courthouse consolidated court facilities that had previously operated at three separate addresses in the Region.

The practical version of that is short. Waterloo Regional Police run a division out of 45 Columbia Street East in Waterloo. A person arrested by officers working out of that division still answers the charge in Kitchener. The police boundary and the court boundary are not the same line, and the court boundary is the one that decides where you stand on the day.

That is also why this is a single page rather than two. A firm can run a Kitchener page and a Waterloo page and point them both at the same address, and some do. It adds nothing for the reader. One page that explains why the Region has one criminal courthouse is more use than two pages that avoid the question.

The risk of the stale address: three courthouses that no longer exist

If a website, an older letter, or a relative with a long memory sends you to a courthouse on Weber Street or to Main Street in Cambridge, the information is out of date. Infrastructure Ontario states that the Waterloo Region Courthouse consolidated the Ontario Court of Justice and Superior Court of Justice facilities previously located at 89-103 Main Street in Cambridge, at 20 Weber Street East in Kitchener, and at 200 Frederick Street in Kitchener.

Three buildings closed into one. Anyone still publishing those addresses as court addresses is publishing a closed building, and the fact that stale addresses survive online for years is precisely why a missed first appearance is more common than people assume.

One point of caution, and we would rather raise it than let you infer something we cannot prove. Waterloo Regional Police operate their Central Division at 200 Frederick Street, which is one of the three addresses named in that consolidation. We are not going to tell you the police division occupies the old courthouse, because no official source we can find says so. Two separately sourced facts sitting at the same street number is not the same thing as a documented connection.

The replacement building is large and, for a first time visitor, disorienting. Infrastructure Ontario describes seven storeys on a site bounded by Frederick, Weber, Duke and Scott streets, thirty courtrooms including one multiple accused high security courtroom built for large and complex criminal cases, two remote testimony suites for vulnerable witnesses, and a single public entry point with magnetometers and x-ray screening. Many courtrooms carry a sliding panel so the judicial Coat of Arms can be changed, which allows one room to serve the Superior Court or the Ontario Court of Justice on civil, criminal or family work.

Two consequences follow for you. Everyone funnels through one screening point, so arriving at the minute your matter is called is not arriving on time. And because a room can change its court overnight, the courtroom number on a document three months old is worth confirming rather than trusting.

The risk of hiring a Toronto firm for a Waterloo Region case: what it costs you, where it does not matter, and where it does

Kazandji Law is a Toronto criminal defence firm. Our offices are at 180 John Street in Toronto, 7191 Yonge Street in Thornhill, North York and Oakville. There is no Kazandji Law office in Kitchener, in Waterloo or in Cambridge, and there is no arrangement dressed up to look like one. If proximity is what you are buying, buy it from someone whose name is on a door on Frederick Street.

What we actually do on a Waterloo Region file is two things. We travel to 85 Frederick Street and appear. And we use the remote options the court permits at the stages where the court permits them. The second half of that sentence is where most firm pages, including out of town ones, become vague. Here is the law, stated properly, so you can hold any firm to it.

The starting position is in person. Section 715.21 of the Criminal Code provides that a person who appears at, participates in or presides at a proceeding shall do so in person, except as otherwise provided. Remote attendance is the exception Parliament carved out, not the modern default, and any firm telling you the whole thing runs on video is telling you something the Code does not say.

Two different provisions then do two different jobs, and they are regularly blurred. Section 715.23 governs the accused or offender: before allowing or requiring you to appear by audioconference or videoconference under any of sections 715.231 to 715.241, the court must be satisfied that it is appropriate having regard to all the circumstances, including your location and personal circumstances, the costs of appearing in person, the suitability of the place you would appear from, your right to a fair and public hearing, and the nature and seriousness of the offence. The provision that covers defence counsel is a different one. Section 715.25 defines a participant as a person other than an accused, an offender, a witness, a juror, a judge or a justice, which is where defence counsel sits, and allows the court to let a participant take part remotely on a comparable set of factors. Section 715.25(5) adds that unless the court orders otherwise, the party whose participant appears remotely pays the technology costs. If a firm cites section 715.23 as the reason its lawyer can appear by video, it has cited the wrong section.

The stage by stage provisions run from section 715.231 through section 715.241 and they are not uniform. A preliminary inquiry, a summary trial, an indictable trial, a plea and a sentencing each carry their own consent requirements. Two further sections matter to anyone relying on remote attendance: section 715.221 requires the court to put reasons on the record when it refuses a remote request, and section 715.222 allows the court to end a remote appearance at any time and take whatever measure it considers appropriate. Permission granted is not permission kept.

Layered on top is the practice direction currently in force, Mode of Appearance for Ontario Court of Justice Criminal Proceedings, issued by Chief Justice Sharon Nicklas under rules 1.4 and 5 of the Criminal Rules of the Ontario Court of Justice. It supersedes and replaces the earlier Revised Guidelines, which the Court states are no longer in effect. It is specific about what runs remotely.

Stage	How it normally runs	Who decides
First appearance after arrest, and bail	Accused persons appear by video unless the Court directs otherwise. Sureties may appear in person or by video, with audio available by permission	The Court, and in some locations the Regional Senior Judge or Regional Senior Justice of the Peace
Case management appearances, including intensive case management and trial confirmation	Out of custody accused persons and counsel may appear virtually by Zoom or in person. Counsel attending virtually are expected to attend by video	A judicial officer may direct in person attendance in any given case
Judicial pre-trials	Conducted by video unless otherwise directed	A judicial officer
Guilty pleas and sentencing	All participants in person unless the Court allows a virtual plea, which requires an application, normally filed at least three business days ahead on the Court form	The judge, on application
Trials and preliminary inquiries	All participants in person unless a judge orders otherwise, normally on a written application	The judge, on application

The entitlement question is separate and much simpler. A lawyer holding a Class L1 licence from the Law Society of Ontario is licensed to practise across the province. The licence is not tied to a city, a region or a courthouse. There is no local call, no local admission and no registration step before a Toronto lawyer appears in Kitchener. A lawyer from Toronto stands at 85 Frederick Street on the same footing as a lawyer whose office is four minutes away on foot.

So where does the distance actually cost you something? In availability at short notice. If your bail is revoked on a Tuesday afternoon, the lawyer already in the building has an advantage that no amount of honesty closes. It also costs you in the informal texture of a local practice, the accumulated sense of who runs which list. Where it costs you nothing is in entitlement, in written work, in disclosure review, in Crown pre-trial negotiation, in judicial pre-trials conducted by video, and in the great majority of case management appearances.

We would rather you weigh that than take our word for it. If your file is one where someone needs to be in the Region at short notice on a recurring basis, say so on the first call and we will tell you honestly whether we are the right firm. Turning down a file we cannot properly cover is cheaper for everyone than taking it.

The risk of joining the wrong Courtroom 101

Kitchener has two Courtroom 101s. They are in different buildings, they belong to different courts, and they have different connection details. This catches people every month.

The criminal one is at 85 Frederick Street. The Ontario Court of Justice runs its virtual criminal case management court there in Courtroom 101, and the published schedule is 9 a.m. for all matters. That is worth pausing on, because it is unusual. Ottawa, London and Windsor all tier their case management lists by category, sending counsel matters, duty counsel matters and self represented accused to different hours of the day. Kitchener does not. Everything is called at nine.

The other Courtroom 101 is the Region of Waterloo Provincial Offences courtroom at 77 Queen Street North, where mandatory appearances on a Summons to Defendant are heard in person or by Zoom. Same number, different building, different link, different court entirely.

If you are searching for a Zoom link with a room number and no address, stop. Go back to the document you were given and find the street address. That is the only reliable discriminator between the two.

There is a second room at 85 Frederick Street worth knowing about. Kitchener runs a Judge-led Intensive Case Management Court in Courtroom 105 on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays at 2:15 p.m. It exists for matters that need closer judicial attention to keep moving, it is governed by its own practice direction from the Ontario Court of Justice, and whether a matter is placed there is a judicial decision rather than yours or ours. Being sent there is not a punishment and it is not a signal that a case is failing. The Court also lists no separate trial readiness court and no separate plea court for Kitchener, which makes the published structure here leaner than at several comparable courthouses.

The untiered list has a practical edge. When every category of matter is called at the same hour, the order things are reached depends on who is present and ready, and a person who joins late or joins by telephone when video was expected can lose most of a morning.

The risk of missing the fingerprinting window in Room LL105

This is the single most avoidable problem on this page, and almost nobody writes about it.

If you have been charged with a criminal offence in Waterloo Region, you will usually be required to attend for fingerprinting and photographs. Waterloo Regional Police publish limited walk in availability for accused persons, without an appointment, between 1:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday afternoons, at the Waterloo Region Courthouse, 85 Frederick Street, Room LL105, Kitchener. If you were given an appointment and missed it, the service asks you to call 519-570-9777 extension 8111 to rebook.

Read that address again, because it surprises people. The fingerprinting happens inside the courthouse, in a lower level room, not at a police division. Someone who assumes they need to go to Maple Grove Road in Cambridge or Columbia Street East in Waterloo will waste a trip and may miss the window entirely.

Published hours change. Confirm the current window with Waterloo Regional Police before relying on it, and keep whatever paperwork you are given afterwards. Proof that you complied is worth having later.

The risk of talking to the officer, and where your statement ends up

Waterloo Regional Police polices Kitchener, Waterloo and Cambridge and the surrounding townships of the Region. The service publishes its own locations, and the geography is not what most people expect.

• Headquarters, 200 Maple Grove Road, Cambridge N3H 5M1, 519-570-9777.
• North Division, 45 Columbia Street East, Waterloo N2J 4N7.
• Central Division, 200 Frederick Street, Kitchener N2G 4G3.
• South Division, 176 Hespeler Road, Cambridge N1R 6V7.

The headquarters of the police service that covers Kitchener and Waterloo is in Cambridge. That single fact explains a good deal of the confusion people arrive with about who has their file and where their property is being held. Outside the boundary of the Region, Ontario Provincial Police detachments police the surrounding areas, and a charge laid just past the line can be returnable at a different courthouse altogether.

None of that changes the advice, which is old and dull and correct. You are not required to explain yourself to an investigator. You have the right to remain silent and the right to speak with counsel without delay, and those two rights are worth more in the first hour than in any hour afterwards. What you say is recorded, transcribed, and handed to the Crown as part of disclosure. It will be read aloud at a trial if it helps the prosecution and it will be read aloud if it hurts you, and an explanation offered while you are frightened rarely survives cross examination intact.

Nor does helpfulness buy leniency. Officers do not decide what happens to your case. A Crown Attorney does, working from a file that will contain your words either way. If you have already given a statement, say so early. Its admissibility can be tested. The statement you conceal from your own lawyer is the one that does real damage.

The risk of breaching a condition you forgot you had

More people in Waterloo Region acquire a second criminal charge from a release document than from a second incident. It happens because release conditions are handed over at the worst possible moment, read once, and then carried around in a coat pocket for months.

Whether you were released by the police on an undertaking or by a justice on a release order, the terms bind you the moment they are signed. The common ones are familiar and deceptively simple on paper: do not communicate directly or indirectly with a named person, do not attend within a set distance of an address, reside at a stated place, abide by a curfew, surrender firearms, report as required, do not consume alcohol. Each of them is the sort of thing an ordinary week can breach without any intent at all.

Two features make a breach worse than the underlying charge in practice. First, breaching is a distinct offence, so it stands on its own even if the original allegation collapses. Second, it is usually far easier to prove. A prosecutor does not need to establish what happened on the night in question, only that there was an order, that you knew of it, and that you did the prohibited thing. A text message, a doorbell camera, or a message passed through a mutual friend can be enough.

The indirect communication clause causes the most trouble. Asking a cousin to pass on an apology is communication. Turning up at a shared workplace can breach that clause and an area restriction at once. If a condition has become impossible to live with, the answer is an application to vary it. Conditions can be changed. Breaches cannot be undone.

If you are unclear about what a condition means, treat that as urgent rather than embarrassing. Read more about how release terms are set and challenged on our Ontario bail hearing page, and about the separate machinery of peace bonds on our section 810 recognizance page.

The risk of your surety changing their mind

A surety is a person who promises the court that you will attend your dates and obey your conditions, and who pledges an amount of money against that promise. It is a serious undertaking made by somebody who usually loves you, often at three in the morning, sometimes without a full understanding of what they have agreed to supervise.

Months later, the picture can look different. The surety has been enforcing a curfew on an adult relative. There has been an argument. They are tired, or worried, or the living arrangement has broken down. A surety who no longer wishes to continue is entitled to apply to be relieved, and when that happens the consequence for you is immediate and unpleasant: a warrant can issue, you can be arrested, and you can find yourself back in custody waiting for a fresh hearing to decide whether some other plan of supervision is acceptable.

The preventable version of this is nearly always about communication. A surety who is told at the outset exactly what they are signing, who has a way to raise a problem before it becomes a crisis, and who understands that the answer to a difficult week is a phone call to counsel rather than a walk into a police station, tends not to become a surety who withdraws. Where a plan genuinely is no longer workable, a replacement or a varied plan can often be put together in advance and presented to the court, which is a very different proceeding from an emergency arrest.

Sureties should also understand the financial edge of the promise. The pledged amount is rarely paid up front, but it is real, and it can be forfeited if the promise is broken. Anyone asked to act as a surety deserves that conversation before signing. Our show cause hearing page explains how a release plan is built and argued.

The risk of pleading guilty to make it stop

This is the quiet one. Nobody plans it. A case has gone on for the better part of a year, the conditions are wearing, the dates keep being adjourned, and someone reasonable says the whole thing can be finished on Thursday if you simply agree. The relief on offer is genuine. So is the cost, and the cost arrives later.

A guilty plea in Canada has to be informed, voluntary and unequivocal, and section 606(1.1) requires the court to be satisfied that you understand the plea is an admission of the essential elements, that you understand its nature and consequences, and that the judge is not bound by any agreement between counsel. Judges take that inquiry seriously. But the inquiry tests whether you understand what you are doing. It does not test whether the Crown could actually have proved the case.

The practice direction also sets a real procedural expectation here. All participants must appear in person for a guilty plea and sentencing unless the Court allows a virtual plea, and the Court publishes a Virtual Plea Application form to be used on consent, ordinarily filed at least three business days before the proposed date. An oral application to the plea court judge is possible, but counsel making one has to be ready with an alternative if it is refused. In other words, a plea is not something that quietly happens over video because it is convenient.

Before agreeing to anything, three questions are worth putting to your own lawyer in plain language. Has the disclosure been reviewed in full, including the material that has to be requested rather than delivered automatically. Is there a Charter issue in how the evidence was obtained. And what precisely does the record look like afterwards, not in general but for your work, your travel and your status. A discharge, a conviction, a withdrawal and a peace bond leave four different footprints, and our pages on record suspensions and immigration consequences of a conviction set out what each one means afterwards.

Resolution is often the right outcome. Resolution chosen because the process has become exhausting is a different thing, and it is worth naming the difference out loud before Thursday rather than after it.

The risk of letting the first 9 a.m. appearance pass without disclosure

The nine o’clock list in Courtroom 101 is not where cases are decided. It is where they are moved along. The risk is that several of those appearances pass in sequence, each one lasting under a minute, and the file is four months old before anyone has actually read the evidence.

Disclosure is the engine of a criminal defence. The Crown is obliged to disclose the relevant material in its possession, and that obligation is ongoing rather than a single delivery. The first package is rarely the whole package. Officer notes, occurrence reports, 911 recordings, in car and body worn video, cell tower records, forensic certificates and continuity documents often arrive only after somebody asks for them by name, and knowing what to ask for is most of the skill.

The contacts that matter at 85 Frederick Street are published by the Court and by the Ministry. The Crown Attorney’s office at the courthouse can be reached on 519-741-3222. We deliberately do not print a Crown email address here, because two official government pages list two different addresses for the same office, and sending disclosure correspondence to the wrong inbox costs you weeks. Confirm the current address with the office itself, or let counsel do it. Federal prosecutions, which include most drug offences, run through the Public Prosecution Service of Canada, reachable in Kitchener at PPSCKitchenerSPPC@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca or 519-571-5778. Duty counsel can be reached at dcc.kitchener@lao.on.ca or 519-578-0869, and Legal Aid Ontario on 1-800-668-8258. The courthouse itself publishes Kitchener.OCJ.courts@ontario.ca and 519-741-3200.

Two prosecution services means two disclosure routes and, frequently, two different attitudes to resolution. If your charge is under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Crown across the table is federal, and our drug offence defence page explains how those files tend to run.

You also do not have to be personally present for every routine date. Kitchener publishes a dedicated filing address for Enhanced Designations of Counsel, Kitchener.OCJ.Designations@ontario.ca. Under the Court’s practice direction on Enhanced Designations, a represented accused who has filed one can have matters adjourned without attending in person. It has to be filed properly, and it does not stretch to pleas, sentencings, trials or preliminary inquiries, which carry their own attendance rules. Used correctly it removes a great deal of pointless travel, which matters more when you are working shifts than any lawyer usually admits.

The risk of choosing a lawyer on proximity alone

An office near the courthouse is a real advantage on some files. On others it is worth almost nothing, and it is a poor proxy for the things that decide outcomes. Four questions test a criminal lawyer better than a postcode does, and you should put them to us as readily as to anyone else.

1. Who will actually stand up on my dates? Not which firm. Which person. If the answer is that it depends, ask what it depends on and how often the file changes hands.
2. How many matters of this kind have you run to a contested conclusion? Every firm handles assaults. Fewer have argued a contested one recently. The distinction is not rude to raise.
3. What is the worst realistic outcome here? A lawyer who only describes the best case is managing your mood rather than your file. You want the person who will say the unwelcome thing on day one.
4. What can you not do for me? This is the question that separates candour from salesmanship, and the answer tells you more than the other three combined.

Two corollaries. Be wary of any prediction of outcome offered before disclosure has been reviewed, because nobody can responsibly make one. And be wary of a page that claims a presence in a city where the firm has no office, a discipline we hold ourselves to here and on every other city page we publish.

If proximity is decisive for your particular file, hire locally with our blessing. If it is not, judge us on the four questions. Some of the work we are proudest of is set out on our case results page.

Why Kazandji Law

Kazandji Law is a Toronto criminal defence firm with four offices across the Greater Toronto Area. None of them is in Waterloo Region. We appear at 85 Frederick Street for Kitchener, Waterloo and Cambridge matters, and we would rather write that sentence plainly than imply an address we do not hold.

• Toronto, head office. 180 John Street, Unit 320, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1X5.
• Thornhill. 7191 Yonge Street, Suite 310, serving our Markham and York Region clients.
• North York. For clients in the north end of the city.
• Oakville. Serving Halton and the western end of the GTA.

Fadi Matthew Kazandji is the founding partner. The firm is built around criminal defence, with a family law practice alongside it. The criminal work runs across bail, driving offences, assault and domestic matters, drugs, weapons, fraud and property offences, sexual offences, youth matters and appeals. If you want the wider view of how we run files, start with our criminal defence practice, or read about assault charges, fraud allegations and youth criminal matters.

A Waterloo Region file gets the same treatment as a Toronto one: disclosure read properly, the Crown engaged early, and an honest account of where the case stands at every stage, including the stages where the news is bad. What we will not do is take a file we cannot cover properly. If that is your file, we will say so on the first call rather than after a retainer.

Questions people actually ask about 85 Frederick Street

This page is general information about criminal procedure in Waterloo Region and it is not legal advice. Reading it does not create a solicitor and client relationship with Kazandji Law. Court locations, courtroom assignments, published hours and contact details change, so confirm anything time sensitive with the court or the police service before you rely on it. If you have been charged, speak with a lawyer about your own circumstances.