Criminal Lawyer Niagara: Defence at St. Catharines, Welland and Fort Erie

Home > Criminal Defence > Niagara

Niagara does not have one criminal courthouse. It has three, and the best known city in the region is not home to any of them. If you were arrested in Niagara Falls, your matter is listed somewhere else, and the paperwork in your hand is the only thing that tells you where. This page sets out what a Niagara criminal charge will actually require of you in person, and which of those obligations somebody else can carry for you.

Written by Fadi Matthew Kazandji, Founding Partner at Kazandji Law. Reviewed 13 September 2026.

The Niagara question that matters is not where the courthouse is. It is what this case will require of you in person

Almost everyone who calls us after a Niagara arrest opens with a geography question. Which courthouse. How far. Do I have to drive there. Reasonable questions, and this page answers them. But they are the second question.

The first is a burden question. A criminal charge is a set of obligations attached to your name. Some can be lifted off you completely, so you never do the thing at all. Some can be discharged from a laptop at your own kitchen table. Some require you physically present in a room in St. Catharines, Welland or Fort Erie, on a date the court chooses, and no lawyer and no technology changes that. Sorting your file into those three piles is the most useful thing anyone can do for you in the first week.

This page is ordered that way on purpose, from the obligations that can disappear to the point where the law stops accommodating you. Nothing below is a promise about your case. Remote attendance in Ontario criminal courts is permissive, not automatic, and a judicial officer can refuse it or end it. Where this page says a thing is possible, it means the law allows a judge to permit it, not that a judge will. Our criminal defence practice page covers the charge types we take on.

You were arrested in Niagara Falls. Where does your case actually go?

This is the most common misunderstanding in the region, and it costs people a missed court date every week.

Niagara Falls has the Niagara Regional Police Service headquarters at 5700 Valley Way. It is where a great many Niagara arrests are processed, and it is where people assume their case will be heard. It has no criminal courthouse. None. There is no Ontario Court of Justice criminal sitting in Niagara Falls, so a Niagara Falls arrest does not produce a Niagara Falls court date, because there is nowhere for that date to be.

Criminal matters in Niagara Region are heard at three Ontario Court of Justice locations. We re-checked all three addresses against the Court’s own site and the Ministry court locations site on 13 September 2026: St. Catharines, 59 Church Street; Welland, 102 East Main Street; and Fort Erie, 200 Jarvis Street, where the Ministry states a limited number of services are available and asks you to call before visiting about services and hours.

Policing across the whole region is done by one service. There is no Niagara Falls Police, no Welland Police and no St. Catharines Police. The Niagara Regional Police Service covers all twelve local municipalities, which is why the place you were arrested and the place you appear are so often different.

Where the arrest happened	Criminal courthouse in that municipality?	What that means for you
St. Catharines	Yes. 59 Church Street.	Ontario Court of Justice criminal and criminal youth matters sit here, and so does Superior Court criminal work.
Welland	Yes. 102 East Main Street.	Criminal and criminal youth matters sit here. Not to be confused with 445 East Main Street, the Provincial Offences court, which hears no Criminal Code charges.
Fort Erie	Yes, with limits. 200 Jarvis Street.	Criminal is the court type listed, but the Ministry warns services are limited and asks you to call ahead.
Niagara Falls	No.	Regional police headquarters is here, at 5700 Valley Way, but there is no criminal courthouse. Your matter is listed at one of the three above.
Niagara-on-the-Lake, Thorold, Pelham, Port Colborne, Wainfleet	No.	Same position as Niagara Falls. The courthouse named on your paperwork governs, not the municipality where you were stopped.
Grimsby, Lincoln, West Lincoln	No.	Same again. These west Niagara municipalities sit closer to Hamilton than to Welland, but a Niagara charge is still a Niagara charge.

So how do you find out which is yours? Read the document you were given on release, or the summons or appearance notice that followed. It names a courthouse and a date, and that document is the authority, not an assumption based on where the police car took you. If you cannot read it, photograph it and send it to us before you travel. Our nearest sibling pages cover the courthouses next door, Hamilton and Burlington.

We have no Niagara office. Here is precisely what we do instead

Kazandji Law has four offices: Toronto at 180 John Street Unit 320, Thornhill at 7191 Yonge Street Suite 310, North York and Oakville. Not one is in Niagara Region, and we are not going to write a sentence here that implies otherwise. If three other firm pages this morning gave you the warm impression of a local storefront, check their addresses.

What a Toronto firm actually does for a Niagara file comes down to two things.

We travel and appear. A lawyer’s licence in this province is issued by the Law Society of Ontario, and a Class L1 licence authorises practice as a barrister and solicitor throughout Ontario. It is not tied to a city, a region or a courthouse. There is no local admission, registration or permission step before walking into 59 Church Street, 102 East Main Street or 200 Jarvis Street. When your matter needs a body in the room, we drive down and we are the body in the room.

We use the remote options the Court permits, in the stages where it permits them. This is where most firm pages go wrong, so here is the law with the section numbers, because the section numbers are the point.

Criminal Code section 715.21 sets the baseline: except as otherwise provided in the Act, a person who appears at, participates in or presides at a proceeding shall do so in person. In-person attendance is the rule and remote attendance is the carve-out. Two different provisions then govern two different people, and competitor pages blur them constantly.

• Section 715.23 governs you, the accused. Before allowing or requiring an accused or offender to appear by audioconference or videoconference under sections 715.231 to 715.241, the court must be of the opinion that it would be appropriate having regard to all the circumstances, expressly including your location and personal circumstances, the costs of appearing in person, the suitability of the place you would appear from, the right to a fair and public hearing, and the nature and seriousness of the offence.
• Section 715.25 governs your lawyer. It defines a participant as any person, other than an accused, an offender, a witness, a juror, a judge or a justice, who may participate in a proceeding, and defence counsel sits inside that definition. Subsection 715.25(2) allows the court to permit a participant to take part remotely where appropriate, and subsection 715.25(5) adds that unless the court orders otherwise, the party whose participant appears remotely carries the technology costs.

If a page tells you section 715.23 lets your lawyer appear by video, that page is wrong. Section 715.23 is about you. The provision covering counsel is section 715.25. Small thing, and it tells you whether the writer read the statute.

The stage-by-stage provisions run from section 715.231 through section 715.241, setting different consent requirements for preliminary inquiries, summary conviction trials, indictable trials, pleas and sentencings. Two more are worth carrying in your head: section 715.221 requires a court refusing a remote request under this Part to state reasons on the record, and section 715.222 lets the court end a remote appearance at any time. Permission given is not permission kept.

Above the statute sits a practice direction, Mode of Appearance for Ontario Court of Justice Criminal Proceedings, issued by Chief Justice Sharon Nicklas under rules 1.4 and 5 of the Criminal Rules of the Ontario Court of Justice. Case management appearances and judicial pre-trials are its remote-friendly end. Guilty pleas, sentencings, trials and preliminary inquiries are the other end: all participants in person unless a judge orders otherwise.

Then comes the paragraph that constrains us rather than helping us. Section B(1) of that direction provides that because private consultation across mixed modes is difficult, counsel, both Crown and defence, are expected to attend all criminal proceedings other than case management appearances in person if the accused is appearing in person, unless a judicial officer directs otherwise. That is the honest limit on every remote-service promise in this market. If you are standing in the courtroom at 59 Church Street, your lawyer is expected beside you, not on a screen. We cannot promise a file conducted entirely at a distance and we will not.

The obligations that can be lifted off you entirely

Start at the top of the ladder, with the appearances you can stop attending altogether.

Most criminal files in Niagara do not move in one hearing. They move through a series of short case management appearances, each lasting a couple of minutes, at which a date is set, an adjournment granted or a matter spoken to. Multiply those across the life of a file and an unrepresented person can spend a year taking mornings off work to say almost nothing.

The Ontario Court of Justice publishes a direction on Enhanced Designations of Counsel. Where a represented accused has filed one, matters can be adjourned without that person appearing personally. The obligation does not move to a screen. It leaves you. There is a parallel route for people held in custody, a waiver of personal attendance, serving a comparable purpose from the other side of the wall.

Neither is automatic and neither covers everything. A designation does not cover a plea, a sentencing, a trial or a preliminary inquiry, and it does not survive a judicial officer directing you to attend. What it does is strip the routine appearances out of your calendar, which for most people is the largest practical burden a charge imposes before anything is decided. If your matter is listed in Fort Erie and you live in Grimsby, that is worth more than any promise about outcomes.

What you personally have to do before your first appearance

A small number of things genuinely cannot be delegated, and they all sit in the first fortnight.

Read your release document properly. Not just the date. It names the courthouse, the time, and the conditions you have been living under since you signed it. People skim it and then breach a condition they never registered, turning a defensible file into two files.

Write down what happened while you still remember it. Times, who was present, what was said, what the officer told you, when you asked for a lawyer and what followed. Memory degrades fast, and the details that matter in a Charter argument are the first to fade.

Stop talking about it. Not to the complainant, not to a witness, not on social media, and not to the officer who calls back to see whether you want to clarify anything. If a no contact condition is in force, treat it as absolute.

Retain counsel before the first date, not on it. Arriving with a lawyer already on the record, rather than hoping to catch duty counsel in a hallway, is the difference between a file that moves and a file that drifts.

What you do not have to do is diagnose your own charge. Whether it is an assault allegation, a theft charge or something described in words you did not recognise, the classification and the Crown’s position are our problem. Bring us the paper and the memory.

The appearances you can attend from your own kitchen table

Below the obligations that disappear sit the ones you keep but can discharge without leaving home.

The Ontario Court of Justice runs virtual case management courts across Niagara, and each of the three criminal locations has its own arrangement. The Court publishes the joining details, courtroom and schedule on its own location pages, and it changes them. That is why we are not printing meeting numbers or a timetable here. A page that hard-codes a court schedule will be wrong within months, and a wrong court time is worse than no court time.

What is stable enough to state is the shape. Case management appearances are the category that includes first appearances and matters spoken to or set down for a date. The Court’s direction on criminal case management appearances expressly excludes bail proceedings, trials, preliminary hearings, guilty pleas and sentencings. Unless a judicial officer directs otherwise, accused persons and counsel may appear virtually by Zoom or in person, and counsel attending virtually are expected to attend by video rather than audio.

Judicial pre-trials, where the shape of a resolution or a trial is actually negotiated, are conducted by video unless otherwise directed. That is the stage where a Toronto firm working a Niagara file loses the least, because a pre-trial is a conversation and the conversation is the same wherever the participants sit. The Niagara virtual courts also run in tiers through the day rather than calling everybody at once, and we have not reproduced the specific times, because the published sources we reviewed did not agree with each other. Check the Court’s location page for your courthouse, or ask us.

What changes the moment you are represented

People assume the answer is about advocacy. Some of it is. A surprising amount is about queue position and administration.

The Niagara virtual case management courts separate counsel and agent matters from matters involving duty counsel and people appearing without a lawyer. Represented accused are dealt with in their own tier. So a file with a lawyer on it is called, dealt with and released, while a file without one waits for a later tier and then waits again for duty counsel to be free.

There is a second layer. The Court links virtual counsel sign-up sheets from its Niagara location pages, developed to keep counsel matters called in an orderly sequence, with separate sheets for the St. Catharines, Welland and Fort Erie virtual case management courts. Signing on is routine for a retained lawyer and impossible for a self-represented person.

None of this makes you more likely to win. It makes your file move. It also changes who the Crown talks to, because once counsel is on the record, disclosure, resolution discussions and scheduling run lawyer to lawyer. That transfer of burden is invisible until you have experienced the alternative.

What bail asks of you, and what it asks of whoever signs for you

Bail is where the obligations stop being administrative and become personal, for you and for the people around you.

If you are arrested in Niagara and held, your bail hearing happens in the Ontario Court of Justice at the courthouse your matter is directed to. Under the mode of appearance practice direction, accused persons appear by video for bail and first appearances after arrest unless the Court directs otherwise. So the first obligation, attending your own bail hearing, is usually discharged from custody rather than by transport.

The rules governing that hearing changed recently and most firm pages in this region have not caught up. The Ontario Court of Justice issued a Practice Direction Regarding Bail Hearings under rule 5.1 of the Criminal Rules, effective 1 June 2026. We re-read it on 13 September 2026 before publishing. The parts that will matter to you:

• Same day where the parties are ready. All reasonable steps should be taken to accommodate bail hearings, whether or not on consent, on the day the parties are ready to proceed, in weekday bail courts and Weekend and Statutory Holiday bail courts alike.
• Thirty minutes for a routine contested hearing. Paragraph 3.5 records the Court’s expectation that routine contested bail hearings will be completed in no longer than 30 minutes, subject to the discretion of the presiding judicial officer.
• Fifteen minutes for a consent release. Paragraph 3.6 sets the same expectation at 15 minutes, and all proposed consent releases put before the court are to be dealt with that day.
• A structured opening. The parties set out the onus, the Crown position on detention, the grounds in issue, the Crown position on form of release, the defence position and the defence plan of release.

Understand what those numbers are. They are the Court’s stated expectations, expressly subject to judicial discretion, and nobody can sell them to you as guarantees. What they do is set the standard your preparation has to meet. A release plan that can be presented properly in 30 minutes was built before the hearing, not assembled in a cell interview beforehand.

Where a surety is required, the obligation shifts onto somebody who loves you. That person may have to satisfy the court about their means, their relationship to you and their willingness to supervise, and confirm the accuracy of what is before the court under oath. The practice direction provides that where a surety’s attendance is required, the surety may attend by audio-video conference unless directed to attend in person, and the mode of appearance direction is to similar effect.

One route worth knowing. A matter with two or more listed features can be identified as a Complex Bail Matter, making it eligible for additional court time, ordinarily not exceeding two hours, heard the day it is identified. Those features include two or more proposed sureties where the Crown seeks to cross-examine, matters requiring an interpreter, a section 524 application where two or more release orders already exist, and specialized prosecution team matters. Our bail hearing practice page goes further into how we build a release plan.

Where remote attendance stops and your body has to be in the room

Everything above is the accommodating end of the system. Here is the end that does not accommodate.

The Ontario Court of Justice states on its own St. Catharines page that St. Catharines plea courts are in person unless the judicial official directs otherwise. That is the Court, publishing a local restatement of the province-wide position, on the page for the busiest criminal courthouse in the region. It settles an argument: if a firm has told you your Niagara file can run entirely at a distance, the Court has published a sentence contradicting them.

The broader position sorts by proceeding type rather than by courthouse:

Stage of your case	Default mode of appearance	What that means in practice
Bail hearing and first appearance after arrest	Accused by video unless the Court directs otherwise	You appear from custody. Sureties may appear in person or by video unless otherwise directed.
Case management appearance	Virtually by Zoom or in person, unless a judicial officer directs otherwise	The most delegable stage. With an Enhanced Designation filed you may not have to appear at all.
Judicial pre-trial	By video unless otherwise directed	Counsel and the court negotiate the shape of the case. Travel adds little here.
Guilty plea	In person unless the Court allows a virtual plea	A written virtual plea application on consent exists under sections 715.234 and 715.235. It is an application, not an entitlement.
Sentencing	In person unless a judge orders otherwise	Same position as a plea, and often the same appearance.
Trial and preliminary inquiry	In person unless a judge orders otherwise	The hard floor. Plan work, childcare and travel around it from the beginning.

Section B(1) then closes the loop on counsel: where you appear in person, your lawyer is expected there in person too, for everything other than case management. So the days you must be in St. Catharines, Welland or Fort Erie are the days we are there as well. Section 715.233 adds an absolute point for the most serious matters: there is no video appearance during a jury trial while evidence is being presented to the jury.

Charges most often reaching this end of the table include sexual assault allegations and weapons offences, where a trial is a realistic destination rather than a remote one.

Two buildings on East Main Street, and the one that is not a criminal court

This section exists because of a specific trap in Welland that catches people every month.

The Welland criminal courthouse is at 102 East Main Street. The Provincial Offences court for Niagara Region is at 445 East Main Street. Same street name, same city, different buildings, entirely different courts. We confirmed the Provincial Offences address against Niagara Region’s own page on 13 September 2026.

Provincial Offences is not criminal court. It handles Highway Traffic Act charges, provincial statutes and municipal by-laws. A Criminal Code charge does not go to 445, and a speeding ticket does not go to 102. Turn up at the wrong one and you lose the day, and depending on what was scheduled you may be marked as having failed to attend.

The distinction bites hardest in driving cases, where the two systems sit closest together. Careless driving is provincial. Impaired operation, driving over 80 and refusing to provide a breath sample are criminal and carry a record. People call both a driving charge and assume one building. If you cannot tell which system you are in, the offence wording and the court address together will tell us in about ten seconds. Ask before you drive.

Who is prosecuting you, and what you are entitled to ask for

Niagara has one police service and more than one prosecutor, which surprises people.

Most Criminal Code charges are prosecuted by the provincial Crown, and in Niagara that work is split between two Crown Attorney offices rather than run from one. There is an office associated with St. Catharines, and an office associated with Welland which also covers Fort Erie matters. That is why a file listed in Welland and a file listed in St. Catharines can feel like they are run by different organisations. In a sense they are.

Federal prosecutions are different again. Offences under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and other federal statutes are prosecuted by the Public Prosecution Service of Canada, which means a separate prosecutor, separate disclosure arrangements and often separate dates. If you are facing a drug offence, and particularly a trafficking allegation, expect the federal track.

We have deliberately not printed Crown email addresses or phone numbers here. The Ontario Court of Justice has been reorganising its location pages and the contact details published earlier this year are gone. A stale Crown address would be worse than none, because you would rely on it. Ask us and we will give you the current contact on the day you need it.

What you are entitled to is disclosure: the relevant material the prosecution holds, including officer notes, statements, video and the synopsis. You do not have to fight for that right to exist. You do sometimes have to chase its delivery, and that is not a job for you, because a self-represented request and a request from counsel on the record do not travel at the same speed.

What we will need from you, and what we will never ask you to do

We will end where the page started, with obligations, this time ours alongside yours.

What we need. The paperwork, all of it, including the pages you think are irrelevant. An honest account of what happened, including the parts that are bad for you, because those are the parts we have to plan around and we would rather hear them from you than read them in disclosure. A working phone number. Your real availability, so we do not agree a trial date you cannot attend. And compliance with every condition you are under, without exception, for as long as they last.

What we will never ask. We will not ask you to speak to police to clear things up. We will not ask you to contact a complainant or witness, directly or through a friend, in any circumstances. We will not ask you to decide on a plea in a hallway because the court is waiting. And we will not ask you to pretend we are around the corner from the courthouse. We will also tell you when the answer is no: if your matter is a straightforward set-date file and a local lawyer can handle it more cheaply, we will say so. A firm that never says no to anyone is not exercising judgment. It is taking retainers.

Why Kazandji Law

Kazandji Law is a criminal defence firm led by Fadi Matthew Kazandji, Founding Partner. We work from four offices in the Greater Toronto Area and act across Ontario, which for Niagara means travelling to appear and using the Court’s remote options where the Court allows them.

• Toronto. 180 John Street, Unit 320, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1X5. Our head office.
• Thornhill. 7191 Yonge Street, Suite 310.
• North York.
• Oakville.

None of those four is in Niagara Region, and we have said so three times on this page because it is what a client most deserves to know before retaining anyone. What we offer instead is a criminal-only practice, a lawyer who has read the practice directions currently in force rather than the ones in force two years ago, and a first conversation in which we tell you honestly whether we are the right firm for your file.

The twelve questions we are asked most often about Niagara

This page is general information about criminal procedure in Niagara Region and in Ontario. It is not legal advice and it does not create a solicitor and client relationship. Court addresses, practice directions and scheduling arrangements change, and the information here was checked on 13 September 2026. Always confirm the courthouse, date and time named on your own court document, and speak to a lawyer about your own circumstances before acting.