K.D. was charged following an argument with a partner that escalated into accusations of violence and threats. By uncovering prior fabricated complaints and bringing forward third-party witnesses, we convinced the Crown to withdraw all charges weeks before trial.
Success Stories
Our Results
At Kazandji Law, we are committed to achieving the best results for our clients in family law. Here are some recent successes showing how we protect our clients’ rights during tough times.
R v CH. — Multimillion-Dollar Proceeds and Drug Charges Reduced
The client was charged with possession of $1.2 million in cash, several kilograms of Schedule I substances, and conspiracy, exposing him to a minimum penitentiary sentence of 14 years. Our firm conducted a week-long preliminary inquiry, rigorously challenging the Crown’s evidence, cross-examining key witnesses, and demonstrating significant gaps in the prosecution’s theory. Two of the three major counts were withdrawn, and the remaining charge was resolved on highly favourable terms.
R v K.A. — Domestic Assault Charges Withdrawn
Our office represented the client on domestic assault allegations that carried serious personal and professional consequences. We conducted a detailed review of the disclosure, identified evidentiary weaknesses, and engaged in focused negotiations with the Crown. Through strategic advocacy and early intervention, we secured a complete withdrawal of all charges.
R v MD — Impaired Operation and Over 80 Dropped
The client was charged with Over 80 and impaired operation with a blood alcohol concentration of 130 mg. Our office scrutinized the breath-testing procedures, Charter implications, and the officer’s notes. Through persistent pre-trials, we established vulnerabilities in the Crown’s case and negotiated a reduction to a Highway Traffic Act offence for careless driving. The criminal charges were withdrawn entirely.
R v A.P. — Assault and Criminal Harassment Charges Withdrawn
The client was facing multiple allegations of assault and criminal harassment. After a thorough analysis of the complainant’s statements and the surrounding context, we prepared a defence strategy highlighting inconsistencies and credibility concerns. Our pre-trial negotiations, supported by a strong evidentiary brief, resulted in the Crown withdrawing all charges.
Spousal Support Claim Successfully Reduced
We represented a client facing an aggressive spousal support claim that far exceeded the proper range under the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines. After a detailed financial analysis and targeted questioning of the opposing party’s disclosure, we exposed significant inconsistencies in their reported expenses and income. Through firm negotiation supported by a clear evidentiary record, we secured a dramatically reduced support amount that aligned with the true guideline range and protected the client’s long-term financial stability.
R v MJ — Multiple Assault and Breach Charges Resolved Favourably
The client faced six charges, including four counts of assault, assault with a weapon, and breach of a release order. We analyzed the sequence of events, challenged the proportionality of the charges, and prepared a comprehensive evidentiary package that reframed the incident. Weeks before trial, we secured a significantly favourable resolution, avoiding the risk of conviction on any of the serious allegations.
Securing 50/50 Parenting Time and Joint Decision-Making
Our firm acted for a parent who had been marginalized from meaningful involvement in their child’s life due to temporary arrangements and unilateral decision-making by the other parent. We gathered evidence demonstrating the client’s consistent involvement, parenting capacity, and stability. After strategic case conferences and persistent negotiation, we secured a 50/50 parenting schedule and joint decision-making authority. This outcome restored balance, reinforced both parents’ roles, and ensured the child’s best interests were properly protected.
Child Support Recalculated and Reduced Based on Accurate Income
The opposing party sought child support far above what the law required. We undertook a comprehensive review of both parties’ income, including tax records, historical earnings, and non-recurring sources of revenue. By correcting the income attribution and challenging improper calculations, we obtained a revised child support order that accurately reflected the client’s true financial situation. The result: a fair, sustainable support obligation grounded in law, not pressure.
Spousal Support Claim Dismissed After Demonstrating Self-Sufficiency
The opposing spouse demanded spousal support despite having a strong employment history and significant earning capacity. We compiled evidence of underemployment, voluntary reduction of hours, and available employment opportunities. By establishing that the claimant was capable of self-sufficiency and not entitled to ongoing support, we successfully defended the claim and avoided any spousal support obligation for our client.
Shared Parenting Achieved Despite Opposing Party’s Objection
We represented a parent seeking shared parenting where the other side was pushing for primary residence. Through careful preparation, we highlighted the child’s strong connection to our client, their established caregiving role, and the lack of evidence supporting the other party’s claims. The court accepted our position, granting shared residence and recognizing the importance of both parents’ involvement in the child’s life.
R. v. X – Sexual Interference Charges Withdrawn
Our client was charged with sexual interference in a case stemming from a custody-related allegation involving a third party. We conducted a detailed review of disclosure, identifying key inconsistencies in the complainant’s statements and timeline. Early strategic negotiations with the Crown led to a full withdrawal of all charges before trial. Our client avoided the public exposure of trial and preserved his career and reputation.
X v. X – High-Net-Worth Divorce, Assets Preserved
We acted for a business owner facing a high-net-worth divorce with contested support and parenting issues. Through forensic asset tracing, we proved exclusions and protected the client’s company from equalization. We negotiated limited, time-capped spousal support and secured a shared parenting regime. The client kept the matrimonial home and avoided liquidation of key assets.
R. v. A.L. – Impaired Operation (Stopped in Traffic)
A.L. was pulled over during a routine traffic stop after swerving slightly. Field sobriety tests appeared inconclusive. By consulting a toxicologist expert and highlighting inconsistencies in the officer’s observations, we showed that A.L. did not operate the vehicle while impaired. The Crown agreed to withdraw all charges just before trial.
R. v. E.M. – Impaired Operation (Parked, Engine Running)
E.M. was found asleep in their car at a rest stop, engine running, with alcohol on their breath. We successfully argued at a bail hearing—and again before the Crown—that there was no intention to drive. Through expert evidence and strategic cross‑examination, we persuaded Crown counsel to dismiss the charges entirely.
R. v. D.T. – Refusal to Provide Breath Sample at RIDE Checkpoint
D.T. refused to provide a breath sample at a Random Transport Unit checkpoint. We filed a detailed Charter challenge, exposing procedural flaws in the roadside testing and inadequate rights advisements. At trial, our submission led to the refusal charge being dismissed on the grounds of Charter breach.
R. v. J.R. – Refusal to Provide Breath Sample (Improper Form)
J.R. declined to blow into the breathalyzer after officers failed to review the correct form as required by law. By meticulously documenting the procedural missteps and filing a motion under Section 8 of the Charter, we secured a full acquittal—the refusal charge was thrown out.
M.N. – High‑Net‑Worth Divorce (Spousal Support)
In a complex divorce involving six-figure incomes and unmerged property interests, we successfully argued for a fair division of assets and secured reasonable spousal support—protecting M.N.’s financial interests and helping them maintain stability during a difficult transition.
L.P. – Child Custody (Relocation Dispute)
L.P. sought to relocate across the country with their two school-aged children. Through careful preparation of a parenting plan supported by expert witnesses and demonstrating continued commitment to co‑parenting, we won full permission for relocation and secured an active role in the children’s upbringing for our client.
R.L. – Emergency Custody (Protective Order)
Our client faced an urgent threat of emotional and physical harm after an abusive relationship ended. We obtained an emergency custody order within 48 hours, put safeguards in place, and negotiated a more permanent parenting agreement to ensure the children’s ongoing safety.
S.F. – Complex Property Division (Self‑Employed Business Owner)
In a dispute involving the valuation of a small business and intertwined personal assets, we worked alongside valuation experts and negotiated a creative settlement. The result protected S.F.’s business ownership while ensuring equitable distribution to their former spouse—without sacrificing business operations.
R. v. J.S. – Domestic Assault & Sexual Assault – Full Acquittal After Trial
J.S. faced multiple charges including sexual assault and assault causing bodily harm in a domestic context. After extensive trial preparation, we dismantled the complainant’s credibility through cross-examination and introduced documentary contradictions that raised serious doubt. The judge delivered a full acquittal on all charges.
R. v. K.D. – Assault with Weapon & Threats – Charges Withdrawn Pre-Trial
R. v. N.H. – Impaired Operation – Charter Challenge Successful
N.H. was charged with impaired operation after an accident. We brought a successful Charter application challenging the arbitrary detention and delay in access to counsel. The breath readings were excluded, and the charge was dismissed at trial.
R. v. M.R. – Refusal to Provide Breath Sample – Breach of Rights
Our client was stopped at a roadside check and charged with refusal. Through a s. 10(b) Charter application, we demonstrated that the right to counsel had been violated when police failed to facilitate timely legal advice. The judge excluded the evidence and dismissed the charge.
R. v. L.T. – Aggravated Assault – Resolution to Simple Assault with No Jail
Initially facing an aggravated assault charge with serious bodily injury allegations, L.T. was looking at significant custodial time. We negotiated a resolution to a simple assault plea with no jail and no criminal record through a conditional discharge, supported by mental health reports and successful counseling.
R. v. F.C. – Domestic Assault – Peace Bond, No Criminal Record
F.C. was charged after a 911 call during a verbal altercation with their spouse. Through pre-trial negotiations and counseling engagement, we secured a peace bond with no admission of guilt and had the criminal charge withdrawn—preserving the client’s clean record and professional licensing.
D.R. – Motion to Change Custody: Sole Decision-Making Granted to Father
D.R. sought to modify an existing joint decision-making order due to concerns about the mother’s instability and lack of cooperation. After a hard-fought motion, including affidavit evidence, parenting assessments, and cross-examination, the court granted our client sole decision-making and primary residence of the children.
A.K. – Relocation Application Opposed – Successfully Prevented Move
Our client opposed the mother’s request to move the children to another province. We mounted a strong challenge showing the disruption to school, family, and routine. The court agreed and dismissed the relocation application, keeping the children in Toronto and preserving our client’s parenting time.
T.B. – High-Conflict Divorce – Business Protected in Equalization
In a divorce involving a multi-million-dollar business, we successfully protected our client’s corporate shares through expert valuation, forensic accounting, and aggressive negotiation. The final equalization left the client’s business intact, with a fair but strategic payout to the spouse.
S.M. – Emergency Custody & Restraining Order
After allegations of emotional abuse and unsafe behavior, we obtained an emergency custody order and exclusive possession of the home within 48 hours. The court later granted our client temporary sole custody and supervised access for the other party pending trial.
M.Y. – International Child Access Agreement
Our client, residing abroad, was being denied access to their children in Canada. We successfully brought a motion under the CLRA and Hague Convention to secure scheduled virtual access and in-person parenting time during international visits, enforced by court order.
L.H. – Spousal Support Variation Application – Support Terminated
L.H. came to us facing indefinite spousal support obligations after a lengthy marriage. We brought a variation motion supported by a material change in circumstances and financial disclosure. The court terminated support, citing the recipient’s increased means and self-sufficiency.