Toronto Tax Evasion Lawyers

Home › Criminal Defence › Toronto Tax Evasion Lawyers

A criminal tax file is unlike any other prosecution in Toronto. The investigator, the prosecutor and the courtroom belong to three different institutions: the Canada Revenue Agency investigates, the Public Prosecution Service of Canada decides whether to prosecute, and the Ontario Court of Justice at 10 Armoury Street hears most of what follows. Understanding that machine, stage by stage, is most of the strategy. If any part of it has already started for you, call 647-588-3234 before you answer another question.

By Fadi Matthew Kazandji, Founding Partner, Kazandji Law. Serving Toronto from our downtown office at 180 John Street. Updated July 2026.

Stage One: How CRA Picks Its Criminal Files

The CRA runs audits by the hundreds of thousands. Criminal investigations are a different animal: rare, slow and chosen. The agency's Criminal Investigations Program, the CIP, takes on significant cases of suspected tax evasion and other tax crimes, and refers the files it builds to the Public Prosecution Service of Canada for possible prosecution. Selection is the first fact about your case worth understanding, because by the time investigators surface, someone has usually already decided the file could support charges.

The CRA publishes what feeds that decision. Files arrive through referrals from its own audit programs, through tips submitted to its Leads Program, through information shared by police agencies, and through publicly available sources. The program's stated priorities are just as public: significant evasion with an international element, promoters of sophisticated schemes, joint investigations with other enforcement agencies including cases where tax evasion shades into money laundering, significant income tax and GST/HST evasion including the underground economy, and schemes aimed at benefits, credits and false refunds.

Read that list the way a defence lawyer reads it. It describes cases with strong paper, identifiable intent evidence, and a story a prosecutor can tell a judge. Not every referral becomes an investigation, and not every investigation ends in charges. The ones that do tend to be the ones where the documents already line up. So the practical lesson for a Toronto business owner or professional is blunt: if you have any reason to think your audit has attracted this kind of attention, the time to get advice is now, while decisions about the file are still being made and your side of the paper can still be assembled calmly.

Stage Two: The Investigation You Feel Before You See

An audit is a civil process about what you owe. A criminal investigation is about whether you deliberately cheated, and the CRA's own materials draw the line exactly there: audits reassess, while criminal investigators gather evidence, interview witnesses, execute search warrants and build a prosecution report. The tools are the tell. Auditors send document requests and proposal letters. Investigators arrive with a warrant, image your phones and computers, pull banking records with production orders, and speak with your bookkeeper, your suppliers and your bank long before they speak with you.

Most people feel the shift before anyone announces it. The auditor who was emailing weekly goes quiet. Questions start reaching third parties. A colleague mentions that officials were asking about you. Then one morning there are officers at the door with a search warrant, and the file you thought was an argument about expenses has become something else entirely.

What you do inside that window matters more than almost anything that follows. Statements made to auditors sit in the file. Records volunteered along the way sit in the file. Explanations offered at the door, in the hallway, or in a well-meant phone call afterwards become exhibits. None of it can be unsaid later, and the Crown will read all of it through the lens of wilfulness.

Stage Three: A Federal Prosecutor Takes Over

When the investigation is complete, the CIP prepares a comprehensive report and refers the case to the Public Prosecution Service of Canada. That referral is a genuine checkpoint, not a rubber stamp. The PPSC reviews the evidence independently and decides whether to initiate and conduct a prosecution on behalf of the federal Crown. If the answer is yes, CRA investigators lay the charges, and in the usual tax case you are summoned to court rather than arrested.

Two things change the moment federal prosecutors take the file. The first is disclosure. The Crown must hand over all relevant material under the Supreme Court's Stinchcombe rule, and in a tax case that means years of banking records, imaged devices, working papers and witness statements. Reviewing it properly is slow, unglamorous work, and it is where defences are found: the spreadsheet that supports your version, the email that shows what the accountant actually advised, the deposit the investigator misread.

The second is pace. The constitutional time limits from R. v. Jordan, 18 months in the provincial court and 30 in the Superior Court net of defence delay, discipline document-heavy prosecutions and give the defence real leverage when the Crown's disclosure arrives late or disorganized. A specialized federal prosecutor will run the file efficiently. The defence has to match that discipline from day one, not discover the file's problems on the courthouse steps.

Stage Four: 10 Armoury Street, and Sometimes 361 University

For most Toronto tax prosecutions the courtroom is the Ontario Court of Justice at 10 Armoury Street. Matters that proceed on indictable routes, and files where related Criminal Code counts push things up, are heard at the Superior Court of Justice at 361 University Avenue. Many routine appearances in both buildings proceed virtually now, which matters when a case is going to run alongside a business you still have to operate.

Arrest is the exception in this world. The CRA's published process describes the accused being summoned to court to stand trial after charges are laid, and that is how most pure tax files begin. Where arrest does happen, usually because Criminal Code counts were added or process was ignored, Toronto bail runs through the Toronto Regional Bail Centre at 2201 Finch Avenue West before the file returns downtown.

Expect marathon litigation, not a sprint. Disclosure arrives in waves, pre-trial conferences narrow the issues, and resolution discussions often run in parallel with trial preparation. Tax files reward the side that knows the documents best, which is why we treat the first ninety days as the most important stretch of the case. This page is part of our wider Toronto criminal defence practice, and the same senior counsel carries the file from first appearance to the end.

The Toronto Fact Patterns That Become Criminal Files

No two prosecutions are identical, but the files that reach our office follow recognizable shapes, and naming yours early tells us a lot about how the Crown will frame it.

• The incorporated professional. A consultant, physician or IT contractor whose corporation paid for a life the reported income does not support. The Crown's exhibit is usually a net-worth analysis; the defence usually lives in what the accountant was told and when.
• The cash-heavy business. Restaurants, contractors, salons and trades where deposits, point-of-sale records and suppliers' invoices tell different stories. These files turn on whose reconstruction of revenue a judge accepts, line by line.
• The GST/HST remittance gap. A business that collected tax from customers and used it to survive a bad year. The conduct is often admitted; the fight is over wilfulness, quantum and whether the fix came before or after the CRA arrived.
• The refund and benefit scheme. Preparer-driven or template claims that produced refunds the filer was never entitled to. These are the files most likely to attract Criminal Code fraud counts alongside the tax charges.
• The offshore or crypto file. Unreported foreign accounts, platform income or disposals that never met a return. International elements sit at the top of the CIP's published priority list, and these investigations tend to be the most document-rich of all.

If you recognize yourself in one of these, resist the urge to self-diagnose from forums and start assembling your own paper instead: returns, working papers, correspondence with advisors, bank statements. The version of events that survives in these cases is the documented one, and the sooner it is organized, the more options counsel has.

What the Two Tax Statutes Each Criminalize

Two federal statutes create the charges. Section 239 of the Income Tax Act sets out five routes to a criminal offence: making or participating in false or deceptive statements in a return, certificate, statement or answer; destroying, altering, mutilating or hiding a taxpayer's records or books to evade tax; making false or deceptive entries, or omitting a material particular, in records or books; wilfully evading or attempting to evade compliance with the Act or payment of taxes; and conspiring with anyone to do any of those things. A parallel subsection covers obtaining or claiming refunds or credits you are not entitled to, in whole or in part.

Section 327 of the Excise Tax Act does the same work for GST/HST. It reaches false statements in returns and applications, destroyed or altered records, false entries, wilful evasion of payment or remittance of tax or net tax, wilfully obtaining refunds or rebates you are not entitled to, and conspiracy. The remittance branch is the one that surprises Toronto businesses. GST/HST you collect from customers is never your money. Using it to cover payroll or rent during a rough quarter feels like a bridge loan from yourself, and it is exactly the pattern these prosecutions target.

What both statutes demand from the Crown is deliberateness. Owing tax is not a crime. Being reassessed is not a crime. Sloppy books, missed filings and aggressive but disclosed positions live in the civil world of penalties and interest. The criminal provisions are aimed at lies: false documents, destroyed records, wilful evasion. That word, wilfully, is where most defences live, and it is why the record of what you knew, what you were told and what you signed ends up deciding these cases. For the province-wide picture beyond Toronto, our Ontario tax evasion overview covers how these prosecutions run across the province.

Percentage Fines: The Arithmetic That Drives These Cases

Tax sentencing runs on percentages, and the base is the amount of tax that was sought to be evaded, not the amount you owe after reassessment. That distinction shapes the entire defence. Here is the map on the two tracks:

Three points matter more than the maximums. First, the fine floors are mandatory: 50 percent on the summary track and 100 percent on indictment. There is no minimum jail term in either statute, but there is always a minimum fine once the Crown proves an evaded amount. Second, the fine is separate from the tax itself, from interest, and from any civil penalties assessed before the charge was laid. Winning the criminal case does not erase the tax debt, and losing it does not pay it. Third, because everything is a percentage, the size of the evaded-amount figure is the single most consequential number in the prosecution. Every dollar the defence strips out of that figure, a deposit that was a loan repayment, an expense that was real, a year that falls outside the pattern, cuts the floor and the ceiling at the same time. Quantum is not a mop-up issue in these files. It is the fight.

Publicity: Court Is Open and the CRA Publishes

Assume your case will be public. The courtroom is open, and the CRA publishes enforcement notifications about charges and convictions, drawn from court records, precisely because it wants the deterrent effect. There is a subscription service for those notifications. Lenders, landlords, licensing bodies, franchisors and business partners do read them.

For a Toronto business owner or professional this is often the consequence that stings longest, and it deserves deliberate handling rather than hope. Nobody can promise to keep a prosecution quiet, and you should walk away from anyone who does. What counsel can control is timing, accuracy and the shape of the record: what gets said in open court, when resolution discussions happen, how agreed facts are framed, and whether the file resolves in a way that reads very differently from the allegation that started it. That work starts with a simple discipline from day one: nobody speaks about the file except your lawyer.

Added Counts: Fraud and Money Laundering Exposure

Criminal tax files do not always stay tax files. The CRA's own enforcement materials confirm that charges are laid under the Income Tax Act, the Excise Tax Act and, where the facts support it, the Criminal Code. Refund and benefit schemes are sometimes prosecuted as fraud, which carries its own penalty structure and its own case law; our Toronto fraud over $5,000 and fraud under $5,000 pages cover that world, and our Ontario fraud defence team handles those files across the province.

Money laundering is the other escalation. Since 2010, tax evasion has been a designated offence capable of grounding a laundering count, so moving the proceeds, through accounts, into property, out of the country, can become its own charge with its own forfeiture machinery. If your file has that flavour, read our Toronto money laundering defence page as well.

Stacked counts change the calculus in two ways. They raise the theoretical maximum exposure well beyond the tax statutes, and for anyone who is not a Canadian citizen they raise immigration stakes that need to be assessed before any resolution decision is made. The defence plan has to account for every count on the sheet, not just the one with the biggest number.

The Voluntary Disclosures Program, Briefly and Honestly

There is one off-ramp that exists before charges do, and it deserves a clear-eyed description rather than a sales pitch. The Voluntary Disclosures Program lets taxpayers and registrants come forward to fix errors or omissions in their filings. Relief is granted case by case. If an application qualifies, CRA's published position is that you receive relief from penalties and part of the interest, as well as relief from criminal prosecution. You still pay the taxes you owe, plus partial interest. Nobody is forgiven the tax.

The program changed on October 1, 2025. Applications are now sorted into unprompted and prompted streams, with a separate path for GST/HST wash transactions, and the CRA grants a higher level of relief to people who correct errors before being contacted than to those who move only after a letter arrives. That is the timing trap in plain view: the door narrows once the CRA reaches out, and the program is not designed for people already under criminal investigation.

Whether to file, when to file, and what to include is a strategy decision with criminal consequences on both sides, made quickly and quietly with counsel, often alongside your accountant. Our Markham tax evasion page walks through the disclosure decision in more depth, and the analysis is the same wherever in the GTA you file from.

How the Defence Attacks a Paper Prosecution

Every criminal tax case reduces to the same battleground: wilfulness. The Crown has to prove deliberate conduct, false statements, destroyed records, intentional evasion, and the defence work is to pull the story back into the civil world of error, delegation and disorder. Sloppy is not criminal. Wrong is not criminal. Trusting the wrong person is not criminal.

That is why the advice trail matters so much. If an accountant, bookkeeper or spouse ran the books, what you disclosed to them, what they told you, what you signed and what warnings you received all bear on intent. Genuine reliance on a professional is powerful evidence. It is not automatic protection, and the same emails can cut both ways, which is why we reconstruct the whole trail before deciding whether reliance is your shield or the Crown's exhibit.

The rest of the defence toolkit: quantum attacks, because the percentage fine makes every dollar of the alleged evasion figure worth fighting; disclosure pressure in banker's-box cases where the Crown's organization falls behind its obligations; Charter scrutiny of how warrants were obtained and how devices were searched; and, for corporations charged alongside their owners, structural decisions about whose interests need separate counsel. White-collar files also travel in packs. The same records that interest the CRA sometimes interest securities regulators, and our Toronto securities offence practice handles that parallel lane.

The First 72 Hours After a CRA Search in Toronto

Search day is designed to be overwhelming, and the three days that follow are when files are won and lost. Officers arrive early, secure the premises, and work methodically through cabinets, servers and phones. You are entitled to see the warrant. Read it, note what locations and records it covers, and say nothing about the merits of anything. Politeness costs you nothing; explanation can cost you the case.

Once the search team leaves, the discipline starts. Write down everything while it is fresh: who attended, what was said, what was taken, which devices left the building. Ask for or assemble an inventory of seized items. Do not reconstruct, tidy or amend records afterwards, however innocent the urge, because altering or hiding books is one of the listed offences and post-search housekeeping reads terribly in a courtroom. Do not call the auditor to smooth things over. Do not let a well-meaning manager give a statement in the lobby.

Then get the information flowing in one direction only. Staff, bookkeepers and your accountant should be told, calmly and in writing, that all CRA contact now runs through defence counsel. Payroll, filings and remittances due next week still have to happen, and counsel will help you keep the business compliant without feeding the investigation. In the same window we are already at work on the legal side: reviewing the warrant and the information used to obtain it, contacting the investigators to confirm counsel of record, and mapping which of the two statutes, and which track, the file is actually on.

Corporations, Directors and the Two-Client Problem

Toronto tax prosecutions frequently name two accused: the corporation and the person who ran it. A company can be charged and fined in its own right, and a conviction against it carries consequences with banks, sureties, suppliers and licensing bodies that outlast the court file. The individual faces the percentage fines and the jail exposure personally. The Crown often treats the pair as one story; the defence usually cannot.

The reason is that the interests split. What is best for the business, a fast, quiet corporate resolution that stops the bleeding, is not always best for the owner who would wear the personal record, and vice versa. Sometimes one lawyer can properly act for both. Often the right answer is separate counsel with a coordinated strategy, decided early, before anyone gives a statement or signs anything. We flag the conflict question in the first meeting rather than discovering it at the plea stage.

There is also a continuity problem nobody warns you about: the prosecution does not pause the business. Returns still fall due, GST/HST still has to be collected and remitted correctly, and new compliance mistakes made during the case become fresh ammunition. Part of our job is making sure the company's ongoing filings are clean while the historical fight runs its course.

The Criminal Case and the Tax Appeal: Which One Waits

Most people charged criminally are also fighting a reassessment, and the two proceedings are connected by statute in ways that matter. Both the Income Tax Act and the Excise Tax Act let the Minister file a stay of a Tax Court appeal where substantially the same facts are at issue in the prosecution, so the civil fight can be frozen until the criminal one ends. That sequencing is not a technicality. It decides which forum tests the evidence first, and what testimony exists on the record when the criminal trial starts.

The statutes also manage the overlap of punishments: a person convicted criminally is not liable to certain civil penalties for the same contravention unless those penalties were assessed before the charge was laid. In practice, that means the order in which the CRA assessed, charged and prosecuted needs to be reconstructed carefully, because it changes the total financial exposure and sometimes the negotiating room.

None of this is something to sort out alone with a general practitioner. The criminal defence, the tax appeal and the collections file need one coordinated calendar, and the person coordinating it should be the one whose job is keeping you out of jail.

Why Kazandji Law for a Toronto Tax Prosecution

Criminal tax defence sits at the junction of two professions, and we are honest about which one we are. We are criminal defence counsel. We work alongside your tax advisors, not instead of them, and we run the part of the file where liberty, records and reputations are decided. Senior counsel handles your matter personally from the first meeting to the last appearance.

• Toronto (HQ): 180 John St, Unit 320, minutes from both 10 Armoury Street and 361 University Avenue
• North York: serving clients across the northern half of the city
• Thornhill: 7191 Yonge St, Suite 310, convenient for Markham and York Region
• Oakville: serving Halton and the western GTA

This page is general legal information for people facing tax investigations and prosecutions in Toronto. It is not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not create a solicitor and client relationship with Kazandji Law. Statutory references were checked against the consolidated Income Tax Act and Excise Tax Act as published by the federal Department of Justice, current to May 26, 2026. If you are under investigation or charged, speak with a lawyer about your specific circumstances.