Markham Prescription Drug Crimes Lawyer

Home › Markham Criminal Defence › Prescription Drug Crimes

Most prescription drug charges in Markham are not built at a traffic stop. They are built out of a filing cabinet: a pharmacy dispensing history, a clinic chart, a practitioner report, a script a pharmacist refused to fill. By the time a York Regional Police officer calls you, the paper side of the case is often weeks old. Defending it starts with two questions that decide almost everything. Which schedule of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act is your medication in, and which record created the allegation? Kazandji Law defends double doctoring, forged prescription, possession and medication trafficking charges across Markham and York Region.

By Fadi Matthew Kazandji, Founding Partner, Kazandji Law. Serving Markham and York Region. Updated July 2026.

Your medicine cabinet, mapped by schedule

Every count in a prescription drug prosecution traces back to one question: where does the drug sit in the schedules to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act? The schedule decides which offences can apply at all, and it sets the ceiling on every penalty. Two pill bottles sitting side by side on the same nightstand can live in completely different legal worlds.

The part that surprises people most: nearly every prescription opioid sits in Schedule I, the same schedule as heroin and cocaine. Parliament did not create a softer category for medication that came from a pharmacy. So the ceilings attached to a bottle of oxycodone are the highest ones the CDSA has.

One caution before you map your own pills against that table. Different stimulant molecules can sit in different places, and schedules get amended, so we confirm the exact placement of the exact compound on every file before anything is conceded. What the table should tell you is simpler: the same conduct can be a 7 year problem or an 18 month problem depending entirely on the chemistry, which is why the schedule question always comes first. And if the allegation is that you drove after taking your medication, that is a different charge with its own rules, covered on our Markham drug DUI page.

The 30 day rule nobody told you about: double doctoring

Section 4(2) of the CDSA is the offence most of our clients had never heard of until it appeared on their paperwork. Police and Crowns call it double doctoring or prescription shopping. The section itself is about disclosure. It makes it an offence to seek or obtain a Schedule I to IV substance, or a prescription for one, from a practitioner, unless you disclose every controlled substance and every prescription for one that you obtained from any other practitioner within the preceding thirty days.

Read that shape carefully, because it catches people who never forged anything and never lied about a symptom. The offence is the non-disclosure itself. Every prescription in the chain can be genuine, written by a real physician for a real condition, and the charge can still be laid because the second practitioner was not told about the first.

That is how ordinary medical life turns into a criminal file. A walk-in clinic visit while your family doctor is on holiday. A dentist prescribing codeine two weeks after a surgeon prescribed hydromorphone. A patient partway through a taper who switches clinics and starts the story from the beginning. None of those facts convict anyone on their own, and the Crown still has to prove the obtaining, the timeline and the non-disclosure beyond a reasonable doubt. But those are the fact patterns these prosecutions grow out of, and they involve ordinary patients far more often than they involve anything resembling a dealer.

The penalty ladder follows the schedule. Prosecuted by indictment, the maximum is 7 years for a Schedule I substance, 5 years less a day for Schedule II, 3 years for Schedule III, and 18 months for Schedule IV. Prosecuted summarily, a first offence carries a fine of up to $1,000, up to six months in jail, or both, and a subsequent offence carries up to $2,000 and up to a year. The election the Crown makes, plus the chemistry, sets the stakes before a single fact gets argued. The Ontario-wide version of this charge, and how it is being prosecuted across the province, is covered on our Ontario prescription drug crimes page.

What the possession offence actually covers

Section 4(1) says that except as authorized under the regulations, no person shall possess a substance included in Schedule I, II or III. For the opioids and stimulants of Schedule I that is a real offence with real numbers: up to 7 years by indictment, and on summary conviction a fine of up to $1,000 and up to six months for a first offence, doubling for a repeat.

For a Schedule IV benzodiazepine, the possession offence simply does not list the schedule. Charges sometimes get laid wider than the statute allows, and where that happens we say so early. But nobody should draw comfort from a chart without advice on their actual facts. Schedule IV prosecutions live in the conduct around the pills: how the prescription was obtained, whether the script was genuine, and what happened to the medication afterward.

Holding someone else's Schedule I medication, on the other hand, is squarely inside section 4(1). A spouse's oxycodone in your glove box. A friend's ADHD tablets in your bag at a festival. A parent's morphine kept after a death in the family. On each of those files the Crown still has to prove you knew what the substance was and had a measure of control over it, and knowledge is exactly where record-built cases can be thinner than they first look. Possession files, and the diversion options that attach to them, are covered more broadly on our Markham drug offence page.

The forged and altered script lane

Not every prescription charge is a drug charge. When the allegation is that a script was created, changed or passed at a counter, the counts come from the Criminal Code, and they are serious in their own right. Forgery under sections 366 and 367 covers making a false document or altering a genuine one, and carries up to 10 years. Uttering a forged document under section 368, which in a pharmacy case usually means handing the script across the counter, carries the same 10 year maximum. Section 368.1, aimed at the instruments used to make false documents, goes up to 14 years.

The files look like this. A quantity changed from 30 to 90 in different ink. A repeat added where none was written. A reprinted or photocopied pad. A phoned-in prescription quoting a real practitioner's registration number. A script written on a pad reported missing months earlier. Pharmacists are trained to catch all of it, and a Markham pharmacy that refuses to fill a script will often photograph it, keep it, and call both the prescriber and York Regional Police before the customer has left the parking lot.

Two consequences follow. First, a CDSA count often rides beside the forgery count, because obtaining a controlled drug through a false script engages the drug statute too. One counter moment, two prosecutions' worth of exposure. Second, the mental element genuinely matters. Uttering requires knowledge that the document is false, and the person who presents a script that a partner, friend or employer handed them does not automatically have that knowledge. Counter identifications made in seconds get treated as more solid than they are. If your file is mostly about the document rather than the drug, our Markham forgery lawyer page covers that side in more depth.